If sex has no value, how can prostitution be illegal? – Beaufort Observer
Quite possibly the stupidest statement ever made about sex:
North Carolina government officials who are having secret sex with lobbyists need fear no more: The state’s ethics commission has decided such illicit relationships are completely fine…The opinion…essentially says that…Sex has no value…and so it doesn’t need to be disclosed…In an editorial published under the headline “Has the State Ethics Commission made prostitution legal in North Carolina?” the Beaufort Observer denounced the…idea that sex has no monetary value….[and] suggested that the latter idea may lead to the legalization of prostitution…
Dominick Everson admitted to police that he hired Ezrhea Danyell Cherry…[and claimed he] paid [her] before…sex…[but when] he pulled out “a wad of money” to tip [her, she] pulled a gun on him and told him to give it up. Everson [claims]…he [then] pulled a gun of his own and opened fire, striking the woman once in the front and three times in the back. He then fled from the scene in Cherry’s car…During a different interview, Everson told authorities that he didn’t kill the woman at all, and that another man [did]…When prosecutors pressed Everson about why the gun supposedly carried by Cherry wasn’t found, Everson replied that the police had not done a thorough enough investigation.
The idea that men paying for women’s company is “unconventional” is so naive it’s hilarious:
A controversial website is connecting…men with young women for cash…is it safe? Is it even legal?…the average sugar baby receives about $3,000 in monthly allowances…legal analyst Gil Soffer…says this is a legal grey area…It’s fulfilling unconventional needs in a 21st century way.
These articles all contain quotes from “experts” pontificating on the obvious:
…“I absolutely think this is prostitution,” says Laura Killinger, a…former prosecutor…“They have sugar-coated this type of prostitution so that it seems so much more socially acceptable…As a prosecutor, I wanted to take legal action against this activity…but it would take tremendous resources…to make…a misdemeanour case”…
Sometimes “authorities” completely get away with serial rape:
A prison doctor in New Mexico sexually assaults inmates with rectal exams for everything from tooth pain to toenail fungus, seven inmates claim in lawsuits…Dr. Mark Walden regularly performed “digital rectal exams” for no legitimate medical reason, sometimes without wearing gloves, and fondled them inappropriately…When…asked the doctor…”claimed he was milking the plaintiff’s prostate and other medically nonsensical responses”…wardens and prison staff knew about the sexual assaults but did nothing to stop them…complaints and reports…were either ignored, “lost,” or met with retaliation…
And sometimes they only mostly get away with it:
A…Florida [cop] has admitted to [raping] undocumented immigrants…Jonathan Bleiweiss…pleaded guilty to…14 counts of armed false imprisonment, 15 counts of battery and four counts of stalking. However, he avoided all of the charges with [the word] “sex” in them…and as such will not be required…to register as a sex offender…
…In a new Iowa Law Review article, “Prostitution 3.0“, University of Colorado law professor Scott Peppet…[lays] out the myriad benefits of a “technology-enabled sex market” as well as the legal barriers that “inhibit prostitution-related innovation” in America…the legal climate prevents innovation that could make the industry safer and more socially acceptable, and then this danger and stigma is used to justify continued prohibition…Unfortunately, Peppet’s ultimate vision here is “legalizing Prostitution 3.0 while criminalizing the purchase of sex outside of Prostitution 3.0’s parameters”—which seems far from the lofty liberalism and freedom-of-contract ideas Peppet pays lip service to…It’s a vision that seems predicated on a strange sort of techno-utopian statism, and a disappointing one for those of us who believe prostitution problems stem from black markets and state interference. In a nice response article…Scott Cunningham and Todd D. Kendall argue similarly, writing that “most of the social problems associated with prostitution are not inherent to the industry, but they are the logical result of the prohibition itself, a conclusion supported by the fact that other, similar, markets not subject to a prohibition experience few of the problems associated with prostitution”…
Selling sex is clearly not a job many people would care to have…If you criminalize the pimps, then it means women cannot be compelled into selling their bodies for sex, right? Wrong…Some prostitutes will be people who freely choose to engage in prostitution; many, however, “have no meaningful choice…Whether because of financial desperation, drug addictions, mental illness, or compulsion from pimps, they often have little choice but to sell their bodies for money”…The new laws…do not protect women from violent johns…
Three massage parlors were shut down in Lomita [California using the excuse of]…exploitation of women and human trafficking. Although no violations of that nature were found, each business was cited for poor record keeping on matters [of red tape]…Fines could cost the businesses thousands of dollars. They will remain closed until they [fork over the tribute]…Deputies [pretended that]…the operation [was] in response to complaints from residents…
Tracy Clark-Flory interviewed sex workers, including me, for this article on police body cameras:
…Naming and shaming…has a long history in sex work policing. Police departments have routinely published sex worker photos in local newspapers…”I can’t help but wonder what would have been done with the footage had such a camera been rolling at the time of my arrest,” says Maggie McNeill, who was caught in a sex work sting in 2005…”The potential for shaming is staggering, especially given that sex workers are very often nude or nearly so when the police spring the trap—I was…It’s one of the reasons stings so often employ such huge mobs of cops—15 in my case—when two or three would do…The mentality in play is like a low-level version of a gang rape, a group of thugs bonding over sexual humiliation of a woman…I have absolutely no doubt that particularly juicy video clips will end up in cops’ private collections to be traded between them, even if some authority decides that such clips will not be publicly released,” she says…Audacia Ray…of the…Red Umbrella Project…is worried about body cameras being “used as a tool to shame people who are being arrested…police often make sexual or degrading comments at women as they are arresting them”…”We have strong concerns about what malicious third-party content producers might do with records of police encounters,” said Matt Kellegrew, the lead staff attorney for Red Light Legal…”My worst fear is some type of sex-worker-shaming-meets-Cops-style slander/shock videos popping up”…
…a press release…from…Sheri’s Ranch, a licensed brothel in Nevada…was…incredibly vile, self-serving (even by PR standards) and stigmatizing to sex workers…We’re used to seeing efforts to deride and harm sex workers, and ugly, flagrant whorephobia, from radical feminist and anti-sex nut jobs like Melissa Farley and Gail Dines, but this one came from a business…that profits off the efforts of sex workers…“We’re concerned that sugar dating websites, platforms promoting prostitution and operating without interference from law enforcement, may one day negatively impact our legal prostitution business.” This is what our friend Maggie McNeill calls “badge-licking”. What sex worker on the planet — and what individual citizen, for that matter — thinks that increased interference in their lives or business by law enforcement is a good thing? While, I give them points for honesty on the “we’re concerned” this will hurt our business bit, the whole thing sounds as though Sheri’s is trying to smear its competition. And by “competition” we mean, other sex workers…
End result of prohibitionism: more women are pushed into sex work:
The sex industry that once thrived in Dongguan [China]…has now scurried underground after the hammering of official raids and crackdowns seeking to eradicate the industry last year…Shops and parlors closed down; people were arrested by the hundreds…though places which once provided sex services were forced to close and all the businesses attached to them [were] damaged…sex workers remain…and work at home…[or on] the streets…some female residents who used to work at the region’s bars or catering businesses that failed to survive have become sex workers “for the better pay”…
Dr. Miriam Grossman…[says that] Fifty Shades of Grey teaches your daughter that pain and humiliation are erotic, and your son, that girls want a guy who controls, intimidates and threatens…The first thing you’ll hear from advocates of BDSM is that consent makes it all A-Okay. That’s bullshit, folks. Domestic violence shelters are filled to the gills with women who deluded themselves into thinking that intimacy involved consent to being abused…Somewhere along the way, it ends up like the bonding with one’s captor that occurs in Stockholm Syndrome…Young people…especially females, grossly underestimate the effect of sexual activity on their emotions…Men who habitually indulge in BDSM can also end up thinking that a woman’s “consent” to be abused excuses every abusive thing they might say or do to her…indulgence in…BDSM acts as an addictive drug. It can render such men incapable of any sex that is not BDSM…
Another wake-up call to wives:
Monogamy is against most men’s biological nature. But nest-building and settling down with one primary woman to raise a family is not. He’s chosen you, not me. He might see me as more fun, vivacious or sexual, but he sees you as the best candidate for wife, mother and life companion. He takes you seriously; not me…he…would rather seek out a willing mistress than rock the boat with you by expressing his frustration at your loss of interest in sex…I’m basically a young, good-looking version of a therapist…[whom] he gets to fuck…
The Biggest Whores:
Absolutely fascinating. I bet these people are also claiming they are not prostitutes as all. Come to think of it, how do lobbyist salaries compare to escort rates?
Hello! First time poster here. I’m a great fan of your blog and one of your numerous Canadian admirers.
About Biggest Whore above: my personal understanding is that sex has no inherent financial value even if it is very often treated as a commodity. If I give someone sex they cannot trade back the sex they received for other commodities. If I cannot pay back a loan, the bank is not going to seize my sexual assets. I do not have to declare my annual sex on my tax return. In that respect the judgement is right and sex is ”not reportable as gifts or ‘reportable expenditures made for lobbying”.
That would be different if, for example, you hire a prostitute for a politician. In that case it would be like giving them a pair of tickets for a concert or some other gifts with a fixed monetary value. However, if I sing a song to a politician that’s also not something they should disclose, even though some people can pay hundreds of dollars to hear other people sing.
Two adults exchanging sex in private, that has no other value than what they both agree on. I don’t know enough about law and ethics to really tell how problematic the judgement is, but the reasoning is not far-fetched to me.
Also, it cannot be interpreted to condone prostitution. It claims that sex is priceless. This is not the same as saying it has no value or power. It is actually consistent with prohibitionist morals and laws (those who put a price on the priceless are bad.)
The specific term is that sex with another person is not “fungible”.
Sex does have value while you are doing it (can be positive or negative, depending). It also has value that extends some time beyond having it, like feeling well or having a nice memory (or the contrary). One analogy to buying sex is having a dinner at a restaurant: It certainly has value, it is even a physical object, but the value is maximal while eating and then decreases rapidly.
The other reason why sex (or said dinner) is not fungible, is that the value is hugely subjective, and hence cannot easily be replaced by another instance of the same kind and quality.
That said, sex provided professionally is an entertainment service provided to private individuals, and certainly not much different from other professional services provided to private individuals. And of course, any professional can take pride in a job well done and in a satisfied customer and hence can get far more than just money out of it.
Some people think that sex done non-professionally is different, but I doubt that. It is still transactional, service for service, just that the services exchanged can be very similar. As with any other exchange between individuals, honest people try to match what they return to what they get or giver a bit more, while egoists minimize the value of what they give and maximize what they get. The context can be larger as well, for example sex and children in exchange for financial security and not having to work a job (the classical marriage arrangement).
Like you say, sex is not fungible, but I think it’s much deeper than that. As a society, we do not even have a clear consensus on what exactly sex is. To quote Dr Marty Klein: sex has no intrinsic Meaning. How then can we speak of value?
I think we cannot exactly compare sex with a dinner because a meal has an intrinsic value. It is worth at least the market price of the food consumed. Many intangible things can add extra personal value to the experience, but the economic value of the meal itself is clear. You can however have sexual satisfaction without any tangible expense.
I think your comparison with entertainment is the most accurate. Music, fiction and sport serve an emotional need in our life. We can do that for fun or for profit, alone, with friends or strangers. Again, there is no clear boundary between commercial and non-commercial art and no clear consensus on what is art and what is not.
The same argument can be made for hairdressing, car washing, or any sort of provision of a service. Economics is about the trading of goods and services.
Or to take a different slant, nothing has “inherent” economic value. This is why we don’t have to pay for air, which otherwise would cost a fortune.
Re: Harm Reduction
I think she has a lot of valid points but her article points out why so many women have it in for whores. A younger, prettier, sexually uninhibited woman who is available any time for their husbands or boyfriends is certainly a threat for them since for the very least they no longer control their SO’s sexual access.
I saw this article about “indentured servitude”
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/young-spaniards-moving-germany-trapped-dismal-jobs-071841005–finance.html
wonder if this counts as trafficking?
50SoG – Have you encountered the view that Anastasia Steele character is clearly a pubescent (or prepubescent) girl, that 50SoG is thinly-disguised pedophillia?
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2012/09/50_shades_of_grey_trilogy_normalizing_child_sex_abuse.html