<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saint Death</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/saint-death/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/saint-death/</link>
	<description>Frank commentary from a retired call girl</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:58:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/saint-death/#comment-16420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/?p=6269#comment-16420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have several books on cults I can show you if you like.  1 of my favorite experts on them was Dr. Walter Martin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have several books on cults I can show you if you like.  1 of my favorite experts on them was Dr. Walter Martin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sailor Barsoom</title>
		<link>http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/saint-death/#comment-15409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sailor Barsoom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 04:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/?p=6269#comment-15409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who are these experts, and what exactly is their definition.

Whatever the official definition, the general real-world rule seems to be:
If I like my neighbor&#039;s faith, I call it a religion.
If I&#039;m uncomfortable with my neighbor&#039;s faith, I call it a sect.
If I strongly dislike my neighbor&#039;s faith (or my neighbor), I call it a cult.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are these experts, and what exactly is their definition.</p>
<p>Whatever the official definition, the general real-world rule seems to be:<br />
If I like my neighbor&#8217;s faith, I call it a religion.<br />
If I&#8217;m uncomfortable with my neighbor&#8217;s faith, I call it a sect.<br />
If I strongly dislike my neighbor&#8217;s faith (or my neighbor), I call it a cult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sailor Barsoom</title>
		<link>http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/saint-death/#comment-15408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sailor Barsoom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 04:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/?p=6269#comment-15408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d heard both of them from other people, on two different talk shows, years apart.

I can only take credit for putting the chocolate and the peanut butter together.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d heard both of them from other people, on two different talk shows, years apart.</p>
<p>I can only take credit for putting the chocolate and the peanut butter together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/saint-death/#comment-15332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/?p=6269#comment-15332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cults have no political power?  Really?  Mormon Church anyone?  It&#039;s no coincedence that those who get the votes of the Mormons in Utah have more success than those who don&#039;t.  Mormonism is still considered a cult by the experts in the fields of cults.  It has a huge membership and is still growing.  Many cults have never been popular with many.  An example of a religion that gets constant ###*** is Islam which has a huge amount of members.  The persecution of the NON-terrorist Muslims (which are the majority) is constant and pure evil and has gone up even more since 9/11.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cults have no political power?  Really?  Mormon Church anyone?  It&#8217;s no coincedence that those who get the votes of the Mormons in Utah have more success than those who don&#8217;t.  Mormonism is still considered a cult by the experts in the fields of cults.  It has a huge membership and is still growing.  Many cults have never been popular with many.  An example of a religion that gets constant ###*** is Islam which has a huge amount of members.  The persecution of the NON-terrorist Muslims (which are the majority) is constant and pure evil and has gone up even more since 9/11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/saint-death/#comment-15331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/?p=6269#comment-15331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pagans don&#039;t have a monopoly on connection to the real world, etc.  They never have and no other religion has a monopoly on it either.  The truth is in every religion there&#039;s been examples of connection to the real world.  Also connection to and proof of the spirit world.  If you go to what&#039;s called a &quot;charismatic&quot; Christian church you&#039;ll see these things regularly.  I&#039;ve personally seen/heard: speaking in tongues WITH others interpreting it (which is part of the New Testament Biblical record also), healings, what&#039;s called &quot;word of knowledge&quot; and other things.  I experience an amazing &quot;word of knowledge&quot; in the 1990&#039;s.  This is when a person will give information to people they&#039;ve never met, etc.  It&#039;s amazing.  I also had 1 in the late 1980&#039;s from a small group of people in a church that I&#039;d never met before.  I&#039;ve also had other supernatural experiences.  It gets really tiring to hear how people with any beliefs are JUST following superstitions.  There&#039;s many in ALL religions who truly STUDY THEIR BELIEFS, etc.  I&#039;m 1 of them.  I&#039;ve studied mine since my late teens (when I became a Christian).  The definition of a &quot;cult&quot; by the experts in that field has nothing to do with popularity and never has in every case.  Some cults have always been unpopular with many.  Some have also been very small.  The Mormon Church has a huge membership but has always been considered a cult by the experts in this field.  As far as 1 man saying he&#039;s &quot;god&quot; being automatically crazy, this willfully ignores how 1 man who said it did miracles, raised the dead, rose from the dead Himself, etc.  There were many witnesses to this also.  If there was NO value to Jesus life, then why in the world after St. Paul saw Him did his (Paul&#039;s) life completely change for the better?  I could give many other examples.  Thanks for listening.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pagans don&#8217;t have a monopoly on connection to the real world, etc.  They never have and no other religion has a monopoly on it either.  The truth is in every religion there&#8217;s been examples of connection to the real world.  Also connection to and proof of the spirit world.  If you go to what&#8217;s called a &#8220;charismatic&#8221; Christian church you&#8217;ll see these things regularly.  I&#8217;ve personally seen/heard: speaking in tongues WITH others interpreting it (which is part of the New Testament Biblical record also), healings, what&#8217;s called &#8220;word of knowledge&#8221; and other things.  I experience an amazing &#8220;word of knowledge&#8221; in the 1990&#8242;s.  This is when a person will give information to people they&#8217;ve never met, etc.  It&#8217;s amazing.  I also had 1 in the late 1980&#8242;s from a small group of people in a church that I&#8217;d never met before.  I&#8217;ve also had other supernatural experiences.  It gets really tiring to hear how people with any beliefs are JUST following superstitions.  There&#8217;s many in ALL religions who truly STUDY THEIR BELIEFS, etc.  I&#8217;m 1 of them.  I&#8217;ve studied mine since my late teens (when I became a Christian).  The definition of a &#8220;cult&#8221; by the experts in that field has nothing to do with popularity and never has in every case.  Some cults have always been unpopular with many.  Some have also been very small.  The Mormon Church has a huge membership but has always been considered a cult by the experts in this field.  As far as 1 man saying he&#8217;s &#8220;god&#8221; being automatically crazy, this willfully ignores how 1 man who said it did miracles, raised the dead, rose from the dead Himself, etc.  There were many witnesses to this also.  If there was NO value to Jesus life, then why in the world after St. Paul saw Him did his (Paul&#8217;s) life completely change for the better?  I could give many other examples.  Thanks for listening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aspasialibertine</title>
		<link>http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/saint-death/#comment-15167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aspasialibertine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 01:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/?p=6269#comment-15167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a nutshell. And with a nice rhythm too, did you plan that or is that just your &quot;m4d skillz&quot; as the kids say these days? :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a nutshell. And with a nice rhythm too, did you plan that or is that just your &#8220;m4d skillz&#8221; as the kids say these days? <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sailor Barsoom</title>
		<link>http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/saint-death/#comment-15165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sailor Barsoom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/?p=6269#comment-15165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A religion is a cult that got popular.
A cult is a religion with no political power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A religion is a cult that got popular.<br />
A cult is a religion with no political power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comixchik</title>
		<link>http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/saint-death/#comment-15139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Comixchik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 12:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/?p=6269#comment-15139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US government ignores the Constitution whenever it&#039;s convenient. look at at recent events.

As for persecuting smaller religions, I could easily see it happening because the bigger superstitions don&#039;t want new, upstart competition.

And really, what is the difference between superstition and religion? It&#039;s all just baseless belief in rituals that appease the supernatural. At least the pagans have a connection to the real, natural world we can see and experience.

In this country. I think we protect superstition too much. We allow illogical beliefs to interfere in the good governing and operation of the nation.

After all, one person tells you he&#039;s god, and he&#039;s a mad man. A few people believe him, and it&#039;s a cult. A lot of people believe him, and it&#039;s a religion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US government ignores the Constitution whenever it&#8217;s convenient. look at at recent events.</p>
<p>As for persecuting smaller religions, I could easily see it happening because the bigger superstitions don&#8217;t want new, upstart competition.</p>
<p>And really, what is the difference between superstition and religion? It&#8217;s all just baseless belief in rituals that appease the supernatural. At least the pagans have a connection to the real, natural world we can see and experience.</p>
<p>In this country. I think we protect superstition too much. We allow illogical beliefs to interfere in the good governing and operation of the nation.</p>
<p>After all, one person tells you he&#8217;s god, and he&#8217;s a mad man. A few people believe him, and it&#8217;s a cult. A lot of people believe him, and it&#8217;s a religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n/a</title>
		<link>http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/saint-death/#comment-15133</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[n/a]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 05:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/?p=6269#comment-15133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aubade

I work all day, and get half-drunk at night. 
Waking at four to soundless dark, I stare. 
In time the curtain-edges will grow light. 
Till then I see what&#039;s really always there: 
Unresting death, a whole day nearer now, 
Making all thought impossible but how 
And where and when I shall myself die. 
Arid interrogation: yet the dread 
Of dying, and being dead, 
Flashes afresh to hold and horrify. 
The mind blanks at the glare. Not in remorse 
- The good not done, the love not given, time 
Torn off unused - nor wretchedly because 
An only life can take so long to climb 
Clear of its wrong beginnings, and may never; 
But at the total emptiness for ever, 
The sure extinction that we travel to 
And shall be lost in always. Not to be here, 
Not to be anywhere, 
And soon; nothing more terrible, nothing more true. 

This is a special way of being afraid 
No trick dispels. Religion used to try, 
That vast, moth-eaten musical brocade 
Created to pretend we never die, 
And specious stuff that says No rational being 
Can fear a thing it will not feel, not seeing 
That this is what we fear - no sight, no sound, 
No touch or taste or smell, nothing to think with, 
Nothing to love or link with, 
The anasthetic from which none come round. 

And so it stays just on the edge of vision, 
A small, unfocused blur, a standing chill 
That slows each impulse down to indecision. 
Most things may never happen: this one will, 
And realisation of it rages out 
In furnace-fear when we are caught without 
People or drink. Courage is no good: 
It means not scaring others. Being brave 
Lets no one off the grave. 
Death is no different whined at than withstood. 

Slowly light strengthens, and the room takes shape. 
It stands plain as a wardrobe, what we know, 
Have always known, know that we can&#039;t escape, 
Yet can&#039;t accept. One side will have to go. 
Meanwhile telephones crouch, getting ready to ring 
In locked-up offices, and all the uncaring 
Intricate rented world begins to rouse. 
The sky is white as clay, with no sun. 
Work has to be done. 
Postmen like doctors go from house to house.

Philip Larkin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aubade</p>
<p>I work all day, and get half-drunk at night.<br />
Waking at four to soundless dark, I stare.<br />
In time the curtain-edges will grow light.<br />
Till then I see what&#8217;s really always there:<br />
Unresting death, a whole day nearer now,<br />
Making all thought impossible but how<br />
And where and when I shall myself die.<br />
Arid interrogation: yet the dread<br />
Of dying, and being dead,<br />
Flashes afresh to hold and horrify.<br />
The mind blanks at the glare. Not in remorse<br />
- The good not done, the love not given, time<br />
Torn off unused &#8211; nor wretchedly because<br />
An only life can take so long to climb<br />
Clear of its wrong beginnings, and may never;<br />
But at the total emptiness for ever,<br />
The sure extinction that we travel to<br />
And shall be lost in always. Not to be here,<br />
Not to be anywhere,<br />
And soon; nothing more terrible, nothing more true. </p>
<p>This is a special way of being afraid<br />
No trick dispels. Religion used to try,<br />
That vast, moth-eaten musical brocade<br />
Created to pretend we never die,<br />
And specious stuff that says No rational being<br />
Can fear a thing it will not feel, not seeing<br />
That this is what we fear &#8211; no sight, no sound,<br />
No touch or taste or smell, nothing to think with,<br />
Nothing to love or link with,<br />
The anasthetic from which none come round. </p>
<p>And so it stays just on the edge of vision,<br />
A small, unfocused blur, a standing chill<br />
That slows each impulse down to indecision.<br />
Most things may never happen: this one will,<br />
And realisation of it rages out<br />
In furnace-fear when we are caught without<br />
People or drink. Courage is no good:<br />
It means not scaring others. Being brave<br />
Lets no one off the grave.<br />
Death is no different whined at than withstood. </p>
<p>Slowly light strengthens, and the room takes shape.<br />
It stands plain as a wardrobe, what we know,<br />
Have always known, know that we can&#8217;t escape,<br />
Yet can&#8217;t accept. One side will have to go.<br />
Meanwhile telephones crouch, getting ready to ring<br />
In locked-up offices, and all the uncaring<br />
Intricate rented world begins to rouse.<br />
The sky is white as clay, with no sun.<br />
Work has to be done.<br />
Postmen like doctors go from house to house.</p>
<p>Philip Larkin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silo</title>
		<link>http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/saint-death/#comment-15131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 03:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/?p=6269#comment-15131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your comment made me look back into it because admittedly it&#039;s been ages since I sat that con law class, but it&#039;s more or less what I thought it was (and poorly articulated).  The case in question was a 1993 ruling in the case of Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. Hialeah.  From my understanding of the ruling (as I&#039;m no lawyer), it did not in any way imply that animal sacrifice was legal, only that it was not possible for laws to be passed that specifically outlaw animal sacrifice.

While on the surface that seems one in the same, in reality it&#039;s not as you can still be prosecuted for things such as cruelty to animals, violation of some law about butchering animals, improper disposal, slaughtering an animal in an area not zoned for such, etc.  Thus by codifying what&#039;s acceptable methods of slaughtering animals, the conditions of the facility in which it can take place, and the like states and communities can outlaw such practices without actually outlawing it.  In a very real way, it&#039;s akin to cities bending over backwards to rezone everything such that there is literally no place left where something like a strip club, adult book store, toy shop, or the like can be opened.

But yeah, when speaking about Constitutional heroes, you run into some really strange bedfellows.  I mean, when else would it make sense to bring up Larry Flynt, Howard Stern, and the Jehovah&#039;s Witness, and all in a positive light?

Oh, and the last link in my post above was to the text of the 1796-1797 treaty with Tripoli.  A quick google search can pull it for those who are interested.  

Maggie, if I&#039;m being too long winded feel free to tell me to shut up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comment made me look back into it because admittedly it&#8217;s been ages since I sat that con law class, but it&#8217;s more or less what I thought it was (and poorly articulated).  The case in question was a 1993 ruling in the case of Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. Hialeah.  From my understanding of the ruling (as I&#8217;m no lawyer), it did not in any way imply that animal sacrifice was legal, only that it was not possible for laws to be passed that specifically outlaw animal sacrifice.</p>
<p>While on the surface that seems one in the same, in reality it&#8217;s not as you can still be prosecuted for things such as cruelty to animals, violation of some law about butchering animals, improper disposal, slaughtering an animal in an area not zoned for such, etc.  Thus by codifying what&#8217;s acceptable methods of slaughtering animals, the conditions of the facility in which it can take place, and the like states and communities can outlaw such practices without actually outlawing it.  In a very real way, it&#8217;s akin to cities bending over backwards to rezone everything such that there is literally no place left where something like a strip club, adult book store, toy shop, or the like can be opened.</p>
<p>But yeah, when speaking about Constitutional heroes, you run into some really strange bedfellows.  I mean, when else would it make sense to bring up Larry Flynt, Howard Stern, and the Jehovah&#8217;s Witness, and all in a positive light?</p>
<p>Oh, and the last link in my post above was to the text of the 1796-1797 treaty with Tripoli.  A quick google search can pull it for those who are interested.  </p>
<p>Maggie, if I&#8217;m being too long winded feel free to tell me to shut up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
